Home › Forums › Feature Wishlist › Scaling relative step length to sequence length
This topic contains 3 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by
Adam 11 years ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 2, 2014 at 3:24 am #1560
This is something that I’ve rarely seen in any step sequencer or arpeggiator. To have the entire sequence be a fixed length (one bar, 2 bars, etc.) and have the number of steps modify the length of each step so that the total number of steps plays out over this specific fixed length. The result would be that you could have one sequence running in “4 time” while another runs in “7 time” and achieve polyrhythms.
I can think of two examples of this idea:
The arpeggiator in the EMU Emax, which can scale the tempo of the arpeggio to the number of notes in the chord (more notes = faster rate).
Leon Theramin’s Rhythmicon which created rhythms by layering pulsing sounds that increased in rate at harmonic intervals.
Cheers!
-
This topic was modified 11 years ago by
Adam.
December 2, 2014 at 8:32 pm #1574cant you achieve the same effect by limiting the sequence length of each track independently?
December 3, 2014 at 3:00 pm #1581You can do that but you end up with something that looks like this:
T1(5): 1-2-3-4-5-1-2-3…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…What is like to do is have both sequences last the same amount of time regardless of their step length. Kind if like this:
T1(5): 1—-2—-3—-4—-5—-…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…You can kind of do this if one of your track lengths is half of the other one. You can then set the clock division to half on the shorter track to get this:
T1(4): 1—–2—–3—–4—-…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…That’s great if you want rhythms based on multiple/divisions of 2 or 3. I’m looking to be able to work with other more complex polyrhythms.
December 3, 2014 at 3:17 pm #1584 -
This topic was modified 11 years ago by
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
