[AdamParticipant]

I’ll try that. Thanks!

[AdamParticipant]

Apologies for the numbers on the above post. I can’t seem to get the formatting to display the spacing between the numbers correctly. And now it won’t let me edit it further.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by  Adam. Reason: Typo

[AdamParticipant]

You can do that but you end up with something that looks like this:

T1(5): 1-2-3-4-5-1-2-3…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…

What is like to do is have both sequences last the same amount of time regardless of their step length. Kind if like this:

T1(5): 1—-2—-3—-4—-5—-…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…

You can kind of do this if one of your track lengths is half of the other one. You can then set the clock division to half on the shorter track to get this:

T1(4): 1—–2—–3—–4—-…
T2(8): 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8…

That’s great if you want rhythms based on multiple/divisions of 2 or 3. I’m looking to be able to work with other more complex polyrhythms.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by  Adam. Reason: Formatting
• This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by  Adam.

[AdamParticipant]

What about having a single ratcheting rate per pattern (or global)? That way you might only need to have it set on or off for any given step.

(oops… should have read ahead)

• This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by  Adam.

[Author]

Posts